How the picks and scores are made
Short version: we read each vendor's public pages on 2026-11-12, scored 22 products on a published 7-criterion rubric, and chose picks per buyer type from the scores plus published prices. Medrecords AI publishes this site and sells 1 of the products, so we follow written conflict rules.
Limits: Scores come from what each vendor publishes on its own website, read 2026-11-12. We have not tested these products, so a score measures what a buyer can verify before a sales call, not output quality.
Which products we scored
We started from the Google top 10 for "best medical chronology software" and 4 close variants on 2026-11-12, then added products that name physicians or medical-legal examiners on their own sites. We kept products that produce a medical chronology as software, or as software with a review service attached. Pure retrieval services and pure human review firms are out. That gave 22 products. Leaving a product out is not a judgment on it.
Sources and capture dates
| Source | Used for | Captured |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor pricing, product, security and FAQ pages | Every score and every price | 2026-11-12, linked in each row |
| Vendor blogs | At most 1 point on a criterion, when the product page is silent | 2026-11-12 |
| Google results for 5 searches | Which products to check, and what the field already covers | 2026-11-12 |
| medrecords.ai/pricing.md and llms.txt | Every fact about Medrecords AI | 2026-11-12 |
We saved the text of every page we used, so each score can be traced to the words it rests on. Review sites, other vendors' comparison posts and customer testimonials earn no points.
How scores become picks
- Filter the 22 by what the buyer type can't do without. A solo examiner needs a published price or a self-serve trial; a hospital team needs a BAA.
- Rank what remains by rubric score, with criterion F (clinical fit) and the budget table as tie-breakers.
- Name a runner-up and the catch for each pick, from the same public facts.
- Our product can be a pick only through the same steps, and it is labelled "our pick for" a named case wherever it appears.
Our conflict of interest and the rules we follow
AI Health Studio LLC, doing business as Medrecords AI, publishes this site and sells Medrecords AI, which is scored here. We also wrote the rubric. That is a conflict, and it shows: our product tops the sheet on our own weights. The rules we hold ourselves to:
- The disclosure line sits at the top and bottom of every page.
- Our product is marked "ours" in every table, chart and pick.
- It is scored from its public pages, like every other product, and loses the trial point because its trial needs a demo.
- We publish the weightings under which other products beat ours, and a form to set your own.
- Our product is a pick for 2 buyer types out of 7, and each of those picks lists its catch.
- Links to medrecords.ai appear only on the Medrecords AI page and in marked boxes.
- No vendor paid to be listed, and none can pay to change a score.
Corrections and rescoring
We recheck every vendor page at least every 45 days and rescore all 22 products on the same day, ours included. A vendor can send a link to a public page that changes a fact; confirmed changes go live within 2 business days. The "Updated" date on each page is the last time its facts were checked. Email: aj@medrecords.ai.