Medical chronology software picks by buyer type

By Ahmed Jemaa, Co-Founder and CEO of Medrecords AI. Updated 2026-11-14.

Limits: Scores come from what each vendor publishes on its own website, read 2026-11-12. We have not tested these products, so a score measures what a buyer can verify before a sales call, not output quality.

Start with 2 questions

Most buyers can place themselves with 2 questions: how many pages a month you review, and whether you want only the chronology or the report draft as well. The figure maps those answers to a first trial.

IME, QME or AME examiner with steady volume: MediScan

Why: MediScan's site says it is "formulated for physicians" and lists physician evaluators first. It publishes 3 plans: $169 a month for 1,200 pages, $445 for 3,500 and $665 for 10,000, with overage at 10, 7 and 5 cents a page. It offers a 15-day trial you can start yourself, states SOC 2 audits and BAAs, and says it filters duplicate records. Its FAQ says physicians keep responsibility for the exam, causation, ratings and the signed report, which is the right framing.

The catch: you pay the plan fee in a month with no files, and the site doesn't name its export format. Ask for a Word export in the trial.

Runner-up: InjuryMgmt. $99 a month for 1,500 pages or $249 for 5,000, extra pages at 5 cents, and a clinic EMR add-on at $50 per provider if you also run an injury clinic. Each case is capped at 3,000 pages and 100 MB, so a large file has to be split.

Examiner who wants the report drafted too: IME Coach

Why: IME Coach says it was built by IME physicians for QMEs, AMEs and orthopedic and physiatry examiners. It covers records, a chronology, causation and permanency sections, and exam dictation, with Word and PDF export. You accept the BAA in the app and run your first report free, with no card.

The catch: it is priced around reports, not pages. Plans give 3, 8 or 30 report credits a month ($229, $749, $2,970), and each credit covers 750 to 1,500 pages depending on plan. Pay-per-page is $99 a month credited toward 17 cents a page, the highest per-page rate on our sheet. SOC 2 isn't stated.

Runner-up: Long Health EvalPath. It covers records, exam capture and AMA Guides impairment ratings in 1 workflow. It publishes no price or trial, and on 2026-11-12 the drafting section of its product page still showed placeholder text.

Physician with an occasional file: OctopusLM or CaseMark

Why OctopusLM: no subscription. 10 cents a page, or 5 cents once you load a $300 top-up, and 1,000 free trial pages. It states a page citation on every line, click-through to the source page, and Word and Excel export. It names IME physicians among its users.

Why CaseMark: a medical summary costs $25 plus 1 cent a page, capped at $100 for a record set of up to 25,000 pages. That cap makes it the cheapest published price on our sheet for a large single file. It states a page citation on every entry and PDF or Word output.

The catch: OctopusLM says duplicate pages are billed, and we found no BAA or SOC 2 statement on its pages. CaseMark offers a BAA on monthly plans only, so a pay-as-you-go job with real PHI needs that conversation first. Both are written mostly for legal teams.

Expert witness or standard-of-care reviewer with large files: our pick, Medrecords AI

Why: med mal and expert files pull records from many providers, and the same notes, labs and imaging reports repeat. Medrecords AI removes exact duplicates and doesn't bill them, cites the source page on every output line, keeps citations live in Word and HTML exports, lists missing records, and signs a BAA at signup. Price is 10 cents per deduplicated page, 8 cents at 100,000 credits and 5 cents at 500,000; credits don't expire. This is our product, and this is the case we built it for.

The catch: the 7-day trial (1 case, up to 1,000 pages, no card) opens only after a demo call. On a file with few duplicates, OctopusLM and CaseMark cost less per file. There is no scheduling, dictation or billing module.

Runner-up: Dodonai. It publishes annual plans from $300, states page citations with a side-by-side source view, a BAA and SOC 2, and exports to PDF, Word, XLS or text. It is written for attorney review, and a billable page is about 400 tokens of text, which may differ from a PDF page. Deduplication is listed under its advanced runs.

Physician who wants to pay nothing: Superinsight

Why: Superinsight offers licensed physicians doing med-legal and expert work a free platform with a chronology per case that updates as new records arrive. It says the BAA is countersigned before the first upload and cites events by exhibit and page.

The catch: the free offer is part of an attorney referral network, which some examiners will see as a conflict with their neutral role. SOC 2 is Type 1, and export formats aren't published. If neutrality matters in your work, read its terms before you upload.

Hospital risk or quality team: Medrecords AI (ours), with MediScan as the alternative

Why ours: hospital teams reviewing incidents and claims need a BAA, controlled costs and, in some systems, records that never leave the network. Medrecords AI bills per page with no seats, signs a BAA at signup, and quotes an on-premises license with SSO and local models for teams that can't send PHI to a cloud. That combination is rare on our sheet.

The catch: self-service support is by email, and the on-premises license and its 4-week setup are quoted on a call. Ask for a reference from a team your size before you sign.

Alternative: MediScan, if your reviewers are physicians who want a monthly plan with a known cap. For enterprise claims-style work, Wisedocs and DigitalOwl sell to insurers and publish no prices.

IME company or physician management company: MediScan

Why: MediScan names physician management companies as a buyer and publishes a 10,000-page plan at $665 with 5-cent overage, which keeps a multi-examiner budget predictable. It offers training for physicians and staff.

Runner-up: CaseMark, which says it will build your pre-exam packet layout once so every examiner gets the same format on every referral. Its monthly plans start at $500 a month for litigation support firms, and the BAA comes with monthly plans.

Who each product is built for

Clinical fit is criterion F on our rubric. This table shows who each vendor's own site addresses, with the source and date in every row.

If you are a law firm, most of the market is built for you: EvenUp MedChrons, Supio, MedChron by Filevine, ProPlaintiff, Legalyze and NexLaw ChronoVault all address injury practices. This site's picks are set for physicians and hospital teams.